** 1/2 - A well-researched account of the life of a Georgian gentleman, but there just didn't seem to be enough Elizabeth in it for me to really connect the main character to Mr. Darcy of Pride and Prejudice. Plus, it just seemed a bit... flat.
At a sale of the contents of one of England's great houses, a diary was found hidden away in the secret drawer of an old writing desk. Upon closer examination, it was clear that this was the diary of the real-life Mr. Darcy upon whose romance Jane Austen based her Pride and Prejudice. The diary reveals his daily life fencing, boxing, and occasional wenching; his time spent with friends (including the notorious Lord Byron); and, of course, his rocky romance with Elizabeth Bennet.
I actually liked the premise a lot. It was interesting to see what Regency-era men got up to in their daily lives (much like the PBS special
Regency House Party). There was a lot of sports, some shopping, some business, and a lot of hanging out with friends. This and Darcy's protective instincts toward his sister Georgiana was quite charming. I also liked the way he dealt with Elizabeth's statements to him upon his first disastrous proposal.
I also thought the encounters with Byron were interesting. He really was a fascinating character. It was nice that the author addressed this relatively uncharacteristic friendship with Darcy by making them all old school-friends. But some of Darcy's behavior, while certainly realistic for a Georgian-era man, didn't seem consistent with my conception of the very honorable Fitzwilliam Darcy. To me, Darcy seemed more the type to have kept a mistress before his relationship with Lizzie rather than one to indulge in casual encounters.
Nor am I sure that I liked the motivation the author gives Darcy for separating Bingley from Jane Bennet - it made more sense to me when he simply believed that she was indifferent. Sadly it seemed that there was more discussion of Bingley and Jane's story and romance than there was about Darcy and Elizabeth.
Georgiana also didn't seem quite 'in character'. In the book, she was described as more of a docile girl in awe of her older brother. Here her mood swings between exuberance and more subdued seemed a bit odd.
Other than that, I'm just not sure I 'bought' it. The entire idea of a diary can be quite difficult to make masculine. Here that is partly accomplished by very short, not particularly detailed entries. But there seems to be quite an emphasis on the colors of people's clothing which did not seem particularly manly to me at all. The main issue I had with this, though, was that it did not re-tell many scenes from Austen's original. Because of that, we actually only see very little of Darcy interacting with Elizabeth. I think a bit more detail, including actively re-telling certain key scenes would have tied this more securely to Austen's novel.
In the ARC that I received, the note explaining the premise that Austen based her novel on the actual story of a romance was at the very end - it would have been more effective as a set-up in the beginning of the book.
So my final verdict? It was an interesting read, and I could certainly tell that a lot of research went into this novel - the key is to keep in mind that this is supposed to be the story of the real man that Mr. Darcy was later based on. As that, it works. But I think it's less successful as a re-telling of Austen's novel itself.
Interested in others?